http://www.thoomcare.com/archives/001614.html
http://www.thoomcare.com/archives/001612.html
http://www.thoomcare.com/archives/001611.html
http://www.thoomcare.com/archives/001610.html
Sor wrote:maybe you didn't look well enough Fundin÷
As a kind of follow-up to TMN's comments :
I'm still baffled that we *officially* were the first group to enter the northeast part of the island. I DO believe that it was entered before us, but whoever did and want to claim it now is welcome to provide evidence. Frankly, I don't really care, because what is important (for us) is that we did it as a group, and that we enjoyed a feeling of true discovery. So if whoever-entered-first kept it secret with a sincere intent of preserving other explorers' fun, may they be thanked. If it was just to reap the benefit of the place alone÷ it's only deserved, but at least assume it.
We did boast about it because we're not the ones who usually discover new lands, and also because we believe in sharing enjoyment with the community. However, I like to think that we did it in a motivating way, by revealing just enough for people to realize it was possible, and then investigate and explore by themselves.
Mentioning feather and tinderbox so blatantly was a very lame smartass reaction IMO, and deprived everybody else from having a chance at finding out by themselves. It's such a cheap shot that I can't believe Klur to be the real author. But PM is so good at maintaining confusion that we will probably never know÷ well, so be it :/
More OOC : As for the riddles so far, I must say that it's nice to see NPC pseudo-nonsensical talk having some actual meaning. It took so long to solve them because we're facing game mechanics that we had not seen before, so people probably just discarded doing certain things just because they have no actual effect so far. Once a new behavior is discovered, we adapt and progress much faster
Let's have more loose ends plugged please!
Althea wrote:As for the hints on Thoomcare, that's pretty much neither Klur's style nor PM's style... I'd hope people would have picked up on that.
Jeanne wrote:If he didn't, then someone posted using his name and that just isn't right.
meph wrote:I've never understood why people claim areas as 'theirs' and name it after themselves. (jannars grove for example, caught on) sure its commemorative and all that crap, but it leaves me wondering.. why? its all so capitalistic, competition, competition, competition...
I would say good work to whoever found it before 'SDC', but thats not what they would want, it appears.
How very modest of them.