election prediction
- reckinyards
- Exile
- Post #32
election prediction
a sanctuary city is the definition of cuckreckinyards wrote:
- Maeght
- Exile
- Post #33
election prediction
"It takes one to know one"reckinyards wrote: a sanctuary city is the definition of cuck
- reckinyards
- Exile
- Post #34
- Daimoth
- Exile
- Post #35
election prediction
Le Pen loss, meaning france will probably fall on the sword of african economic migration; particularly from Niger where women are having 6, 7 and 8 children on avg. in an increasingly unlivable environment. Theyll become the most prime example of how devastating mass immigration and a lack of culture conformance is, and the rest will take note.
If sweden and germany arent enough of an example already
If sweden and germany arent enough of an example already
- reckinyards
- Exile
- Post #37
election prediction
reckinyards wrote:
- reckinyards
- Exile
- Post #38
election prediction
there might be hope for france considering hes a centrist, at least hes not any more left or theyd be fucked for sure
- Daimoth
- Exile
- Post #39
election prediction
Hes a globalist banker. He is pro open borders. Hes a centrist just to offend fewer people. He criticized a french firm for bidding for the US wall, and he wants to apologize for the colonization of algeria. Doesnt matter if hes a socialist or capitalist - france is going to fade.reckinyards wrote:there might be hope for france considering hes a centrist, at least hes not any more left or theyd be fucked for sure
- Killian
- Exile
- Post #40
election prediction
Daimoth wrote:Le Pen loss, meaning france will probably fall on the sword of african economic migration; particularly from Niger where women are having 6, 7 and 8 children on avg. in an increasingly unlivable environment. Theyll become the most prime example of how devastating mass immigration and a lack of culture conformance is, and the rest will take note.
If sweden and germany arent enough of an example already
My family served under George Washington when he Commanded the Continental Army. "a lack of culture conformance", No thanks. No ones Culture is my own. My families past i'll hold in my heart and I'll create the rest from here on out.
You are correct when it comes to keeping "bad ones" out but we do what we can. Hindsight is 20/20
- Maeght
- Exile
- Post #41
election prediction
Keeping out the "bad ones"? Go back through reports of terrorist attacks and look at the ages.Killian wrote: My family served under George Washington when he Commanded the Continental Army. "a lack of culture conformance", No thanks. No ones Culture is my own. My families past i'll hold in my heart and I'll create the rest from here on out.
You are correct when it comes to keeping "bad ones" out but we do what we can. Hindsight is 20/20
But it doesn't matter. Racist authoritarians would be willing to let any number of innocents die to keep out one terrorist.
- Daimoth
- Exile
- Post #42
election prediction
Regardless of where your people come from, you conform to the host nation's culture. That should always be the expectation. My surname isn't my ancestors; it was changed when they got here in the 1900's. And that's fine by me, because I agree with you. We forge our own future, and create our own history, as a nation. We don't hold onto and obsess over our lineage from other places. Ultimately, that's not who we really are or the environment we actually know.Killian wrote: My family served under George Washington when he Commanded the Continental Army. "a lack of culture conformance", No thanks. No ones Culture is my own. My families past i'll hold in my heart and I'll create the rest from here on out.
- Maeght
- Exile
- Post #43
election prediction
No. Profoundly and completely wrong. You gain perspective when you interact with other cultures, even in the US. Subsequent generations hybridize as they mix with the old and new cultures.Daimoth wrote: Regardless of where your people come from, you conform to the host nation's culture. That should always be the expectation. My surname isn't my ancestors; it was changed when they got here in the 1900's. And that's fine by me, because I agree with you. We forge our own future, and create our own history, as a nation. We don't hold onto and obsess over our lineage from other places. Ultimately, that's not who we really are or the environment we actually know.
This is difficult to understand when your perspective is entirely self-centered.
- Sala Dragon
- Exile
- Post #45
election prediction
You're missing a critically important word that I bolded in for you.Maeght wrote:
No. Profoundly and completely wrong. You gain perspective when you interact with other cultures, even in the US. Subsequent generations MAY hybridize as they mix with the old and new cultures.
This is difficult to understand when your perspective is entirely self-centered.
Taking in a bunch of immigrants from a single country/culture is one of the dumbest things a country can possibly do (unless it's a basically indistinguishable culture, like Anglo Canadians moving to America and vice-versa). I'm saying this as an immigrant myself with plenty of experience. Large group of immigrants from a single culture in a single region of a host country --> shitty, non-existent integration, which goes on multi-generational if the source population is big enough. Many Americans for instance can and do live in the country where I live and spend 10-20 years here and never learn any of the local languages, and they'll send their kids to private international schools and they'll never learn (or learn it really badly). If a million Americans moved here it'd be a forcible cultural assault. Not all countries want to be or need to be melting pots.
What's funny is I think that you can understand that 1 million Americans moving to, say, Sweden, would be a cultural assault, but you* would say that being against moving 1 million Syrians to Sweden is RACIST. (*maybe not literally you, Maeght, although honestly I would be surprised if not.)